HTML5 mp4 http://david.local/assets/workshop-videos/max_and_dave_timeline_feedback.mov
Max and Dave (with Mitch) review and extend the skeletal roadmap โ money/time/people lens, managed events vs announcements, missing moonshots, and the 42 Protocol.
Summary
A collaborative review session in which Max and Dave (with Mitch contributing) critique and extend the project's skeletal roadmap for the Hitchhiker / Game of 42 project. The opening lens is a triad โ money, time and people โ used to test what each initiative would require to be real, paired with reflections on which forces the trio actually controls (socialization, productization, time, people) versus those it can only express intent toward (money/pitch outcomes, partnership overlaps, each guide's own narrative). The group clarifies a key distinction โ festivals are milestones in an ongoing series of hackathons โ and resolves to leave deliberate free space early in the next year so serendipitous viral moments and follow-on work have somewhere to land, naming the recurring pattern an annual cycle established. Dave frames a complementary rhythm of managed events that must be back-cast from versus announcements that future-cast forward, with convergence/divergence mechanics weaving between them. The conversation then surfaces several missing pieces โ Marvin (a privacy-respecting sovereign AI / Tesla-robot moonshot tour), the No Gen Flip, Rose Day, patron.fish and the Pan Galactic Time Bank โ before turning to clear the outstanding 42 questions, which yields a new 42 Protocol for moderating volunteer surges and an open frontier-labs relationship question. Throughout, the team leans on its trust-graph architecture, now articulated as a pipeline from intent graph to promise graph to trust graph (tied to Dave's complex multi-step-process work at Nuva).
Key points
- Lens of money, time & people: each initiative is tested against whether it needs money, time or people; the trio controls socialization, productization, time and people, but cannot control the money/pitch outcome, partnership overlap, or each guide's individual narrative.
- Control of socialization & narrative: socialization must be controlled early or a viral moment will choose for us; every guide brings their own narrative (e.g. a Rockies hiking guide), so the team builds a framework they can dance/shift into rather than dictating it.
- Partnership overlap as expressed intent: north-star partnerships (e.g. Apple for local AI) live in zero knowledge within the group; they can be voiced as a conference-stage announcement and a serious outreach contact (the JR example of overcoming insecurity), but not pinned to a definitive roadmap.
- Festivals vs hackathons: festivals are milestones in a continuous series of hackathons; hackathons are the follow-up/prep for festivals. Concrete naming of the 42 conferences and the echoing hackathons lets people book flights seriously.
- Deliberate free space & annual cycle: leave a free month early next year so serendipitous opportunities and follow-ons have a home; from ~April people recognize it as a real recurring annual cycle established, not a one-off.
- Intent graph to promise graph to trust graph: Dave's Nuva work on complex 56-step deliverables maps to a toolkit that visualizes promises, weaves them into an intent graph, isolates the critical path, and builds the trust graph out of it.
- Managed events vs announcements (back-cast vs future-cast): managed events (Hitchhiker Radio launch, Groundhog Day, Don't Panic Festival, Game Jam) are back-cast from; announcements future-cast forward; convergence/divergence is the working mechanic. The beam is Christmas. Moonshots (improbable lottery, global game festival) are valued and the team is one or two short.
- Marvin moonshot & No Gen Flip: Marvin = a privacy-respecting sovereign AI on a 128GB MacBook Pro (with Andrea), an early token sale, a September university/Burning Man tour (let's vibe code the future, Marvin says it's a terrible idea), and a Tesla-robot fellowship (like Sophia for SingularityNET); the No Gen Flip (May next year, pushed early) gets ahead of anticipated anti-centralization/censorship backlash around the Fable event.
- Rose Day, patron.fish & Pan Galactic Time Bank: Rose Day (World Book Day / St George's, ~April 24, Barcelona books-and-roses tradition) as a mutual-credit knowledge exchange (rose = promise, book = knowledge); patron.fish for project-management/fundraising (42x42k ~= 1.67M); Pan Galactic Time Bank as volunteer-management + dynamic-equity time-measurement tech, both targeted for September.
Action items
- Name the 42 conferences and their echoing hackathons so a concrete, bookable timeline exists.
- Add a deliberate free month / open space at the start of next year in the roadmap; label the recurring pattern annual cycle established.
- Build and visualize the intent-graph / promise-graph / trust-graph toolkit (Dave, from Nuva multi-step-process work).
- Add one or two more moonshots; back-cast the managed events (Hitchhiker Radio, Groundhog Day, Don't Panic Festival, Game Jam) and future-cast the announcements.
- Put Marvin on the September university tour (Silicon Valley / US, Burning Man announcement); pursue the Tesla-robot robotics fellowship and an early Marvin token sale (with Andrea).
- Place the No Gen Flip early (alongside Marvin) to get ahead of the Fable-event centralization/censorship backlash.
- Stand up Rose Day (~April 24) as a knowledge/mutual-credit exchange with the writers (Graham, theater people).
- Launch patron.fish in September (brand + domain, 42x42k pledge drive); build the Pan Galactic Time Bank by September for volunteer management and dynamic-equity time tracking.
- Place Earth Operating System partnerships (stealth/serious technical path) on the board for Davos (~end of February).
- Draft the new 42 Protocol (Game of 42 time-bank/volunteer-moderation protocol) as a dedicated mini-session and site it next to the crypto white paper; treat moderators as the swordsmen holding the line.
- Answer the frontier-labs relationship question (Anthropic / xAI / Tesla acquisition or partnership terms) and file it with the branding agreement and the No Gen Flip.
- Decide on the open question of high-risk stealth/proxy-fund support for organizations not yet inside the inner trust graph.
See
- Workshop Videos
- Video Template